Civility matters — or at least it should.
In recent months, we have seen a rise in the opposite. From geopolitical upheaval to provincial mud-slinging and local tongue-lashings, our discourse is steeped in incivility.
Following the recent tragedy in British Columbia, Canada’s political leaders stood together. The head of state, the prime minister, and the leader of the official opposition demonstrated that, at least in moments of grief, differences can be set aside. You can read more about this in an opinion editorial written by CHCO-TV News Director Vicki Hogarth titled What it means to be Canadian.
Recently, the Town of Saint Andrews faced a public hearing of objections, a practice that dates back centuries. Days later, Coun. Lee Heenan raised a concern brought to him by constituents, asking: “When did civility leave public hearings?”
That is a good question — one that doesn’t just exist in municipal politics. Local government is the closest to the people. Constituents have front-row access to them in a way not found at any other level of government, which should present valuable opportunities to engage in a meaningful way.
Data that shows the levels of harassment and bullying is increasing. But at what point does one cross that line? The Union of Municipalities of New Brunswick has held symposiums on this issue and sent out a call for expressions of interest in developing an action plan.
Disparaging public servants, local leaders, and administration rarely advances a cause or strengthens a community. Constructive, civil feedback, however, can. They won’t always get it right; this we know. However, that constructive, civil feedback is how we all move forward with the betterment of our communities.
It is the public’s right to question leaders, to challenge decisions, and to demand change. Democracy depends on it. But when the storm of incivility clears, what will be left for us to rebuild on?
